Conspiracy Cafe

Conspiracy, alternative news, history, intelligence agencies


The key to establishing any police state is to get control of the children. If we can remove them from the influence of their parents, we can set up a system akin to a political re-education camp. I recall a Hitler speech that went like this: I don't care about you. You will grow old, wither and die; but I've got your children and they are in my schools. So you see that the greatest battle for the hearts and minds is over the education of your children.

In Winston Churchill's wartime address to Parliament which coined the we shall fight on the beaches speech, we see language at its best; but in the greater, long term struggle he left out several of the most important battle locations. They are of course the school room, the board room, the congresses and parliaments and the churches. If enemies foreign or domestic access dominion over these areas a nation is doomed.

I have, myself, full confidence that if all do their duty, if nothing is neglected, and if the best arrangements are made, as they are being made, we shall prove ourselves once more able to defend our island home, to ride out the storm of war, and to outlive the menace of tyranny, if necessary for years, if necessary alone. At any rate, that is what we are going to try to do. That is the resolve of His Majesty's Government — every man of them. That is the will of Parliament and the nation. The British Empire and the French Republic, linked together in their cause and in their need, will defend to the death their native soil, aiding each other like good comrades to the utmost of their strength.

Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and if, which I do not for a moment believe, this island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.

Universal education is the most corroding and disintegrating poison that liberalism has ever invented for its own destruction.

Adolf Hitler

My education was interrupted only by my schooling

Winston Churchill

I've never let my school interfere with my education.

Mark Twain

The object of education is to prepare the young to educate themselves throughout their lives.

Robert M. Hutchins

You see it is your sovereign duty to educate yourself and your family and teach yourself to learn not to be programmed. Here in Ontario the next step entails not teaching children hand writing anymore. If there is any clue we are being enslaved, this is it. The ultimate freedom was to pen your thoughts on paper and leave them as a legacy. I used to tell my children, "How to you speak to dead people? Read their books. It's a one way conversation, but the answers to many questions we face are contained therein." 

We come across many videos that are quite educational. Many miss the questions of the ages answered therein. The first will solve the global warming conundrum in a quick observation. See if you notice it.

The pen is mightier than the sword or gun or in my case the highlighter pen. I go through many outlining the news and seeing through the lies to bring you this humble little show. The ones who read prepared scripts lead you astray and are well paid for it. Hopefully you learn to think for yourself as God intended you to.
Sort: Recent | Popular Grid List
  • The Einstein Gravity Myth and Fraud Expo...
    by Conspiracy Cafe on April 24, 2017 at 10:17 AM
    43 Views - 0 Comments

  • A Meticulous Analysis of History
    by Conspiracy Cafe on April 11, 2017 at 8:53 AM
    49 Views - 0 Comments

    Pinky and the Brain absolutely brilliant. It was one of the few cartoons I enjoyed my children watching. In these few moments the complex manner on how opinions are manipulated by the deep state are revealed. It should be required viewing in any home schooling situation. The technology is ruling you without your knowledge or consent.

  • DISCOVERY: Oldest Quran Found Has Little...
    by Conspiracy Cafe on March 26, 2017 at 11:19 PM
    81 Views - 0 Comments

    Published on Sep 4, 2014

    Like the bible, and to apparently an even greater extent, the Qur'an of today cannot be claimed to be a true version of the oldest Qur'an in the world discovered in 1972, written in 705-715 AD, and available to researchers in 1979. There are TREMENDOUS differences, an excellent example of one being an original text of "72 grapes" being changed to the infamous "72 virgins" awaiting the faithful in the afterlife hundreds of years later.

    The standard histories of Muhammad and the early development of Islam are based on Islamic literature that dates to the ninth and tenth centuries--some two centuries or more after the death of Muhammad in 632. Islamic literary sources do not exist for the seventh and eighth centuries, when, according to tradition, Muhammad and his immediate followers lived. All that is preserved from this time period are a few commemorative building inscriptions and assorted coins.

    As the researchers meticulously show, the name "Muhammad" first appears on coins in Syria bearing Christian iconography. In this context the name is used as an honorific meaning "revered" or "praiseworthy" and can only refer to Jesus Christ, as Christianity was the predominant religion of the area at this time. This same reference exists in the building inscription of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, built by the caliph `Abd al-Malik.

    The implication of these and other findings here presented is that the early Arab rulers adhered to a sect of Christianity. Indeed, evidence from the Koran, finalized at a much later time, shows that its central theological tenets were influenced by a pre-Nicean, Syrian Christianity. Linguistic analysis also indicates that Aramaic, the common language throughout the Near East for many centuries and the language of Syrian Christianity, significantly influenced the Arabic script and vocabulary used in the Koran. Finally, it was not until the end of the eighth and ninth centuries that Islam formed as a separate religion, and the Quran underwent a period of historical development of at least 200 years.

    In other words, even should one believe the Qur'an as written by Mohammad is a sacred text, the Qur'an of today is a substantially different book, unqualified to be called the true Qur'an or even a reasonable facsimile. Thus contemporary Islam is complete bullshit based on the false and inaccurate Qur'an in current use by Muslims. Muslims leaders, of course, reject the physical and irrefutable evidence and facts presented.

  • Tesla knew Gravity Was Fake | Just Like ...
    by George Freund on February 19, 2017 at 10:51 AM
    189 Views - 0 Comments

    Published on Jan 2, 2017

    Many thanks and respect to: Flatline - Globe is dead

  • NASA Hoax Propulsion In Space Is Impossi...
    by Conspiracy Cafe on February 12, 2017 at 9:40 AM
    159 Views - 0 Comments


    What's physics got to do with it? Everything really. The laws of logic apply in discernment.

    What Are the Three Laws of Logic?

    by ARC on January 6, 2015 in General Apologetics

    By J. P. Moreland

    There are three fundamental laws of logic. Suppose P is any indicative sentence, say, “It is raining.”

    The law of identity: P is P.

    The law of noncontradiction: P is not non-P.

    The law of the excluded middle: Either P or non-P.

    The law of identity says that if a statement such as “It is raining” is true, then the statement is true. More generally, it says that the statement P is the same thing as itself and its different from everyhting else. Applied to all realty, the law of identity says that everything is itself and not something else.

    The law of noncontradiction says that a statement such as “It is raining” cannot be both true and false in the same sense. Of course it could be raining in Missouri and not raining in Arizona, but the principle says that it cannot be raining and not raining at the same time in the same place.

    The law of the excluded middle says that a statement such as “It is raining” is either true or false. There is no other alternative.

    These fundamental laws are true principles governing reality and thought and are assumed by Scripture. Some claim they are arbitrary Western constructions, but this is false. The basic laws of logic govern all reality and thought and are known to be true for at least two reasons: (1) They are intuitively obvious and self-evident. Once one understands a basic law of logic (see below), one can see that it is true. (2) Those who deny them use these principles in their denial, demonstrating that those laws are unavoidable and that it is self-refuting to deny them.

    The basic laws of logic are neither arbitrary inventions of God nor principles that exist completely outside God’s being. Obviously, the laws of logic are not like the laws of nature. God may violate the latter(say, suspend gravity), but He cannot violate the former. Those laws are rooted in God’s own nature. Indeed, some scholars think the passage “In the beginning was the Word [logos]” (Jn 1:1) is accurately translated, “In the beginning was Logic (a divine, rational mind).” For example, even God cannot exist and not exist at the same time, and even God cannot validly believe that red is a color and red is not a color. When people say that God need not behave “logically,” they are using the term in a loose sense to mean “the sensible thing from my point of vew.” Often God does not act in ways that people understand or judge to be what they would do in the circumstances. But God never behaves illogically in the proper sense. He does not violate in His being or thought the fundamental laws of logic.

    We have a word to describe the absence of logic in our philosophies. It is called the gray. That is where propagandists and manipulators take advantage of those less immune to reason information with a similar but counterfeit viewpoint. So Newtonian physics which is a law of the universe requires certain behaviors of force to move an object. These laws can't function as we are told in a vacuum. Hence the laws of logic dictate that the concept is a falsehood whether we understand all the dynamics involved or not. The law of the excluded middle's violation could be termed by the phrase sucking and blowing at the same time. In the vacuum of space, there's no blowing just sucking. So if all the force is drawn away from the source, it can have no effect in instigating motion. In law there is a concept called fruit of the poison tree. The laws of science illustrate the poison tree. It can bear no fruit. So if space travel and the concept of a planetary earth are built upon violation of or concealment of the laws of science, they are nothing more than fairy tales that have been believed too long.

  • The Edge of The Earth Finally found (You...
    by Conspiracy Cafe on February 9, 2017 at 2:34 PM
    156 Views - 0 Comments

    Figure 1. Michelson and Morley's interferometric setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of mercury.

    The Michelson-Morley experiment was performed over the spring and summer of 1887 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and published in November of the same year. It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The result was negative, in that the expected difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles, was found not to exist; this result is generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, which rules out a stationary aether. The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution".

    Michelson–Morley type experiments have been repeated many times with steadily increasing sensitivity. These include experiments from 1902 to 1905, and a series of experiments in the 1920s. More recent optical resonator experiments confirmed the absence of any aether wind at the 10−17 level.[2][3] Together with the Ives–Stilwell and Kennedy–Thorndike experiments, Michelson–Morley type experiments form one of the fundamental tests of special relativity theory.

    Detecting the aether

    Physics theories of the late 19th century assumed that just as surface water waves must have a supporting substance, i.e. a "medium", to move across (in this case water), and audible sound requires a medium to transmit its wave motions (such as air or water), so light must also require a medium, the "luminiferous aether", to transmit its wave motions. Because light can travel through a vacuum, it was assumed that even a vacuum must be filled with aether. Because the speed of light is so large, and because material bodies pass through the aether without obvious friction or drag, it was assumed to have a highly unusual combination of properties. Designing experiments to test the properties of the aether was a high priority of 19th century physics:411ff

    Earth orbits around the Sun at a speed of around 30 km/s (18.64 mi/s), or 108,000 km/h (67,000 mph). The Earth is in motion, so two main possibilities were considered: (1) The aether is stationary and only partially dragged by Earth (proposed by Augustin-Jean Fresnel in 1818), or (2) the aether is completely dragged by Earth and thus shares its motion at Earth's surface (proposed by Sir George Stokes, 1st Baronet in 1844). In addition, James Clerk Maxwell (1865) recognized the electromagnetic nature of light and developed what are now called Maxwell's equations, but these equations were still interpreted as describing the motion of waves through an aether, whose state of motion was unknown. Eventually, Fresnel's idea of an (almost) stationary aether was preferred because it appeared to be confirmed by the Fizeau experiment (1851) and the aberration of star light.


  • The Truth Behind King Arthur
    by George Freund on January 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM
    154 Views - 0 Comments

    Owain Ddantgwyn in Modern Welsh) was a prince of North Wales, probably a King of Rhos in the late 5th century.

    Extant records

    Owain appears in various ancient Welsh genealogies as the son of Einion Yrth and the father of Cynlas Goch. One of these is given the title, 'Pedigree of (the Kings of) Rhos. According to the Bonedd y Saint, he was also the father of SS. Einion Frenin, king of Llyn, Seiriol, and Meirion. Other than these genealogies, no documentary evidence exists concerning his life.

    Arthurian identification

    Some modern authors have conjectured that Owain could be the origin of King Arthur. Although it has not gained wide acceptance among Arthurian scholars, this hypothesis has been proposed by Graham Phillips and Martin Keatman in their book, King Arthur: The True Story (1992).[1] They suggest that "Arthur" was a byname (nickname) and identify its recipient as Owain from a passage in De Excidio Britanniae´, which refers to Owain’s son, Cynlas, as "guider of the chariot which is the receptacle of the bear". "Bear" in Brythonic is "Arth", from which Phillips and Keatman infer that "the Arthur" was Cynlas’s predecessor, known from the genealogies to be Owain. They go on to claim that Owain ruled in Powys. The Owain as Arthur hypothesis draws on the relationships between Owain and his nephew Maelgwn Hir and compares it to the relationship between the Arthur and Mordred of legend. Maelgwn, the "dragon of the isle" is admonished by Gildas for murdering his uncle (Owain) and seizing his throne, events similar to those of legend whereby Mordred murders Arthur.[2]

    While discussing a possible connection between this Owain of Rhôs and the legend of Arthur of Britain it may also be worthy to note the similarity between Owain's epithet Ddantgwyn, meaning "white tooth", and the name of a legendary sword Dyrnwyn (meaning "white hilt") associated with Rhydderch Hael (died c.614), an important king who ruled the northern Kingdom of Strathclyde after Owain Ddantgwyn's death. Rhydderch Hael was also a major protagonist in the war fought against Owain's great nephew, Rhun Hir ap Maelgwn, who had succeeded Maelgwn in c.547 as the king of Gwynedd, by Strathclyde and her northern allies. In the course of this war Rhun of Gwynedd would perish in battle in Strathclyde c.586. The sword Dyrnwyn was one of the so-called Thirteen Treasures of the Island of Britain and apparently held magical properties, similar to those associated with Arthur's legendary sword, Excalibur.

  • The Celts - BBC Series Ep 1 - " In the B...
    by George Freund on January 22, 2017 at 2:52 PM
    154 Views - 0 Comments


    In the debut episode of the series, the program looks at how the Celts were the first European people north of the Alps to rise from anonymity. This program looks at who the Celts were, where they came from and what made their culture so distinctive.


    For 800 years, a proud, vibrant, richly imaginative warrior people swept ruthlessly across Europe. The ancient Greeks called them "Keltoi" and honored them as one of the great barbarian races. Follow their fascinating story from their earliest roots 2,500 years ago through the flowering of their unique culture and their enduring heritage today, enhanced with stunning reconstructions of iron-age villages, dramatizations of major historical events and visits to modern Celtic lands.


    The Celts were the first European people north of the Alps to rise from anonymity. This program looks at who the Celts were, where they came from and what made their culture so distinctive.

  • Race to the South Pole - Tragedy at the ...
    by George Freund on December 20, 2016 at 9:11 AM
    599 Views - 0 Comments

    Scott's party at the South Pole, 18 January 1912. L to R: (standing) Wilson, Scott, Oates; (seated) Bowers, Edgar Evans

    The Terra Nova Expedition, officially the British Antarctic Expedition, was an expedition to Antarctica which took place between 1910 and 1913. It was led by Robert Falcon Scott and had various scientific and geographical objectives. Scott wished to continue the scientific work that he had begun when leading the Discovery Expedition to the Antarctic in 1901?04. He also wanted to be the first to reach the geographic South Pole. He and four companions attained the pole on 17 January 1912, where they found that the Norwegian team led by Roald Amundsen had preceded them by 34 days. Scott's entire party died on the return journey from the pole; some of their bodies, journals, and photographs were found by a search party eight months later.

    The routes to the South Pole taken by Scott (green) and Amundsen (red), 1911–1912

    The expedition, named after its supply ship, was a private venture, financed by public contributions augmented by a government grant. It had further backing from the Admiralty, which released experienced seamen to the expedition, and from the Royal Geographical Society. The expedition's team of scientists carried out a comprehensive scientific programme, while other parties explored Victoria Land and the Western Mountains. An attempted landing and exploration of King Edward VII Land was unsuccessful. A journey to Cape Crozier in June and July 1911 was the first extended sledging journey in the depths of the Antarctic winter.

    Scott and his men at Amundsen's base, Polheim, at the South Pole. Left to right: Scott, Bowers, Wilson, and PO Evans. Picture taken by Lawrence Oates.

    For many years after his death, Scott's status as tragic hero was unchallenged, and few questions were asked about the causes of the disaster which overcame his polar party. In the final quarter of the 20th century the expedition came under closer scrutiny, and more critical views were expressed about its organization and management. The degree of Scott's personal culpability, and more recently, the culpability of certain expedition members, remain controversial.


    Map of route taken to the South Pole showing supply stops and significant events. Scott was found frozen to death with Wilson and Bowers, south of the One Ton Supply depot, in the spot marked "Tent" on the map.


    Of course now we have 20/20 hindsight in the conspiracy realm. Were they sabotaged or prevented from returning? Could they have seen something not fit for the heliocentric model of existence? The approaching rescuers didn't experience the same weather as the approaching explorers it said. Regardless I can't imagine below 40 exposure. I've been outdoors in below 35 with adequate shelter. That was cold enough. I've slept outdoors in below 23. That was wicked. It is hard to stop shivering. If they made a big mistake they neglected bundling - sleeping in pairs to maintain body heat. That was an old survival technique. In light of the South Pole Google Doodle and the interest of the elites to visit or send representatives we review some of the history. The flat earth model illustrates the Antarctic as a barrier to Eden. It is off limits for that reason. You will see the bottom is flat and we are under a dome. It offers protection and retains the atmosphere which would be sucked away by the vacuum of 'space.'

    The blag flag provides interest. It is a pirate's flag, it was Mohammed's, it was used by post war German U-Boats. Some of those were said to go to Antarctica where the German's had a secret base. Still further the black flag was used by the evil overlord Morgoth in the inner earth writings of J. R. Tolkein.

  • The Greatest Mystery of Earth Revealed! ...
    by George Freund on December 19, 2016 at 8:37 AM
    279 Views - 0 Comments

    Published on May 3, 2016

    Ezekiels vision revealed - Gods grand design of our Earth unveiled. Stonehenge decoded - CERN unveiled - The movement of the Sun and Moon unveiled - Rings within rings decoded - Aztec mysteries decoded - The Gateway found on the $20.00 bill revealed!

    All Glory to the Father in Heaven and His Son Jesus Christ all thank to the Holy Spirit for i am only the vessel.

    REVEALED! LEAKED COVER Of Rothschilds’ The Economist 2017 DECODED!

    The Economist 2017 edition uses tarot cards to show the future. One is called the wheel of fortune. I now know they are referring to Ezekiel's Wheel.

  • Fox News Caught Telling The Truth About ...
    by George Freund on November 30, 2016 at 8:59 AM
    231 Views - 0 Comments

    Published on Nov 4, 2015

    It is very rare that Fox News report something that gives black people the respect that they deserve. Lets just call a spade a spade, Fox News is probably the most racist television station not only on earth, but in the universe. They might as well have the Ku Klux Klan as news reporters. But even in darkness, sometimes light can shine through. Well what exactly are we talking about?

    Fox News anchor Glenn Beck did some research on who really founding this country. What he came up with was astonishing. Like most people, he was taught that black people were only slaves in the United States and really didn’t contribute anything to the country other than being a slave. After doing his research, boy oh boy was he wrong. He was so surprised that he decided to contact historians on why information like this was left out of the history books. I salute Glenn Beck of Fox News for not being scared to report this on Fox News. Watch it for yourself.


  • All Wars Are Bankers' Wars
    by George Freund on November 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM
    208 Views - 0 Comments

    Published on Feb 17, 2013 Question: War - What do YOU think its all about ? My answer: War is not about starting or ending them, and even less about who win or who loose. War is always funded 100% on both sites by the global banks (The IMF) with only TWO goals: Population reduction / genocide / mass killing in order to get forward to their main goal: WORLD DOMINATION and this is done from the very start by making sure the IMF system is in total control over the DEBT their war create. Controlling the DEBT of war IS the main purpose, in order to not just control the countries but to TOTALLY take EVERYTHING over !!! In other words: The pure purpose of a war, is the war it self !!

1 - 12 of 156 Videos