Conspiracy Cafe

Conspiracy, alternative news, history, intelligence agencies

Blog

White Nationalists March on University of Virginia

Posted by Conspiracy Cafe on August 12, 2017 at 9:35 AM


White nationalists rallied at a statue of Thomas Jefferson on the grounds of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville on Friday. Student protesters resisting the rally stood with a banner at the foot of the statue


CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — A month after a Ku Klux Klan rally here ended with the police using tear gas on protesters, Charlottesville is bracing for a weekend of white nationalist demonstrations and counterprotests, and suddenly this tranquil college town feels like a city under siege.


Thousands of people — many from out of town — are expected to descend on the city to either protest or participate in a “Unite the Right” rally on Saturday convened by white nationalists who oppose a plan to remove a statue of Robert E. Lee, the Confederate general, from a city park.


“People are angry, they’re scared, they’re hurt, they’re confused,” said the Rev. Seth Wispelwey of the local United Church of Christ. “White supremacists rallying in our town is an act of violence.”


Late Friday night, several hundred torch-bearing men and women marched on the main quadrangle of the University of Virginia’s grounds, shouting, “You will not replace us,” and “Jew will not replace us.” They walked around the Rotunda, the university’s signature building, and to a statue of Thomas Jefferson, where a group of counterprotesters were gathered, and a brawl ensued. At least one person was led away in handcuffs by the police.


LINK:



There seems to be a body of opinion that the civil war was about slavery. That is not the case at all. It was about state's rights as originally laid out in the union and the usurpation of power by a federal government that exceeded that power. D.C. was supposed to exist in a 10 mile square. There were boundary stones set up at the border. D.C. encroached outside of the border, and certain states seceded from the union lawfully I might add because the federal government violated its contract with the states. The federal government waged a war against the states that was long and brutal. As in all wars, the victors write the history. Robert E. Lee was an historical figure. Like all men he was a sinner too. The march south by Sherman was no picnic. It was a brutal occupation. The thing about history and human relations is there are no 'good' guys. All have fallen short somewhere including the protesters on both sides. Christ said it rightly here:


Luke 6:42 Do Not Judge


…41 Why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to notice the beam in your own eye? 42 How can you say, ‘Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,’ while you yourself fail to see the beam in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. 43 No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit.…


If the south had won the war, D.C. would be existing within its limited government mandate. The damage to the future might likely have been no United States to change the course of history in World War II, but then the Russian revolution and and the rise of Hitler might never have occurred either because it was the influence of the Wall Street bankers that allowed the rise of regime change. Ten square miles is all it was supposed to be. However, globalist pushing for a super world state were active even then. They escaped their cage. Will we ever be able to put them back?



BEYOND BORDERS


Abraham Lincoln Quote


“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.”


by: Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) 16th US President


Source:


Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858

(The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, pp. 145-146.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Executive Mansion,

Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:

Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.


As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.


I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without


freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.


I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.


Yours,

A. Lincoln.


http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm


Categories: New World Order